How Long Would It Take To Travel Around The World?
Traveling around the world is a dream of many people, but it can also be an expensive one. The question that often comes up is how long would it take to travel around the world?
That answer depends on what route you are taking and what mode of transportation you are using. We will go over some options in this blog post.
Is It Possible To Travel Around The World?
Yes, you can travel around the world in a variety of ways.
If you have enough money and time and it does not bother you too much that there will be no Internet connection for weeks or even months, this option might suit your needs. If you wish to go on a more challenging trip with fewer people but still want some comfort, then a yacht is a great choice.
You can also take the cheapest option and travel with cargo vessels if you are not afraid of being on the sea for weeks or even months at a time without any access to land.
How Long Would It Take To Travel Around The World?
While there are many different ways to determine the answer, we’ll use a simple method that factors in average speed and time of year. The first assumption is that you would start at either the North or the South Pole: it doesn’t matter which.
You could then fly eastward along a meridian until you reach your destination – this is the shortest distance between two points. Please note that the North and South Poles are not ‘circles’ – they’re lines, which is why we say “along a meridian”.
So this would be closer to 36,901 km (22,860 miles) than 24,901 km (15,485 miles). We’ll take the average of those two values and say that we would travel around 25,000 km (15,500 miles).
For the sake of simplicity, we’ll assume you travel at a constant speed for an entire year, which is not possible.
Let’s say that your average speed over this distance is 100 km/h. A plane could feasibly do this without stopping – it would just need to start and end its journey on water or land. However, there are some problems with using a ship to complete your journey.
First of all, it’s incredibly slow-going and takes so many resources to get up enough speed for it to be worthwhile. Furthermore, you’re limited to traveling along coasts and can’t go too far off-course.
Finally, you have the main problem of finding a ship with enough space for all your supplies that will take you in the right direction without any issues. The next option is overland travel by car. This seems like it would be more efficient than taking a boat.
The average speed of a car is relatively difficult to determine. It depends on numerous factors, such as the size/weight of your vehicle and how often it must stop due to traffic jams or accidents. For our purposes, let’s say that cars have an average speed of around 80 km/h (49 mph). That would mean you could travel around the world in about 33 days.
That’s much faster than taking a boat, but there are still problems with this option too. First of all, even if you have a fast car that gets 100 km/h (62 mph), it will not be able to go everywhere – especially across mountains or deserts where roads don’t exist.
Next, you would still need tons of resources to keep your car running for more than a month. Finally, if there are no roads in an area, then it’s challenging to get around that region without flying or taking some other form of transport. So while having your transportation is pleasant and efficient, it has limitations when traveling across the entire world.
Another option would be travelling around the world by train. It’s much like driving in that it can go anywhere, but at a slower speed (let’s say 60 km/h or 37 mph). This means you would need to take around 40 days.
Of course, there are still problems with this method. First of all, how many passengers could your train hold? It needs enough space for supplies, cargo, and all the people who will be travelling with you. The next question is whether or not there are any stops along the way, and if so, how often?
Finally, what kind of tracks would your train follow to avoid issues like traffic jams? It’s hard enough getting around in an automobile; having a slow-moving train makes your journey nearly impossible.
Another option is to travel around the world by bicycle. This method has several advantages, such as being able to get up hills and over mountains without any trouble. In addition, you only need enough supplies for yourself (no cargo). The best bikes for short women also don’t require fuel as cars do; instead, it runs on muscle power.
The average speed of a bicycle is around 15 km/h (nine mph). That would make it take about 112 days to complete your journey, but you can go anywhere too, as long as there are roads or trails for bicycles. Finally, this method allows you to pause whenever and wherever necessary without affecting the rest of your trip.
It seems like the best option is to take a bike around the world. Not only can you go anywhere, but it’s also quick and efficient compared to the other methods of travel available. It doesn’t require any cargo or fuel (unless you count food). And lastly, having your transportation gives you more freedom than taking public transport or joining a group.
However, there are downsides to this method as well. It takes a long time – 112 days is an entire season. And you also have the problem of needing to find food along the way or having enough supplies for your journey. You could always resupply at stores and restock your water supply from taps too. But still, it will take a lot of time and effort to travel around the world by bike.
A better option would be to take a plane – it has the speed of overland travel without all of its limitations. You can fly anywhere, and an average flight from New York City to London is only about six hours (or just under 4000 km/h). That means that you could cover 25,000 km in about 50 days.
This is the speed we would use to determine how long it takes to travel around the world in this example. All of these calculations were done with a starting and ending point on land, but if you want to factor in traveling through the water as well (which slows everything down), then add about six more months onto your trip.
There are many problems with this plan, though. First of all, you have the issue of finding a plane that can transport enough supplies for so long and is heading in the right direction. The amount of food needed to keep everyone alive would take up much more space than it seems at first glance.
Another problem is fuel – planes need diesel or some other type of fuel to run, and it’s not cheap or easy to come by. It would not be easy to find the resources needed for this journey, especially when you’re traveling around the entire planet.
Finally, some countries do not allow planes over their airspace (or charge a lot of money). If your plane gets shot down or stopped, then you will have to find another way around that region. So while planes are great for speed and efficiency, they also require the most resources out of all these options.
Guinness Book Title
Khawla Al Romaithi of the United Arab Emirates set a world record for the fastest round-the-world trip. She put a Guinness World Record by traveling across all seven continents in three days, 14 hours, and 46 minutes.
Al Romaithi embarked on this voyage to learn about the cultures and traditions of 208 countries and their territories. On February 13, she arrived in Sydney, Australia, to complete her journey.
One of the most common questions people ask is how long it would take to travel around the world. It turns out that there are a lot of factors involved in this question, so you’ll need to ask yourself some critical questions before making any decisions about your travels.
Traffic jams and accidents can cause significant delays in every mode of transport imaginable, even walking. This is just one example of how traveling around the world has its difficulties no matter what you choose to do.
It all depends on your personal preferences as well as your financial situation. Make sure you pack enough food, fuel, and supplies for your journey no matter what type of transport you plan to use.
Leave a Comment