.
.
.
 MichNews.com
  FRONT PAGE
  Today in History
  Newswire
  Matt C. Abbott
  Chris G. Adamo
  Mike M. Bates
  Alan Caruba
  Tom DeWeese
  A.J. DiCintio
  Lee Ellis
  Gabriel Garnica
  Michael J. Gaynor
  Diane M. Grassi
  Gerald A. Honigman
  Jim Kouri
  Rachel Neuwirth
  Doug Schmitz
  J. Grant Swank, Jr.
  JB Williams
  Sher Zieve
  Guest Commentary
.
  News Links

  AP Breaking News
  Drudge Report
  FOX News
  FOX Sports
  News Max
  Right Bias
  Source Daily
  UPI NewsTrack
  Washington Times
  White House
  Internet News
 
America's T.F.
  Bloomberg
  Catholic News
  Christian Headlines
  Christian Post
  Christian Today
  CNET Technology

  Court TV
  Immigration News

  Investors Bus.
  Jihad Watch
  Keep&Bear Arms
  Lucianne

  One News Now
  WorldNet Daily
  World Tribune
  Conservative
  American Spectator
  CNSNews.com
  FrontPage Mag
  Heritage.org
  Human Events
  Michael Savage
  Peter Glover
  Rush Limbaugh
  Sean Hannity
  Townhall
  Weekly Standard
  War on Terror
 
Americans Against Hate

  Black Anthem
  CENTCOM
  Defense Link
  DHS | FBI
  Ready.gov
  Israel
  Debka
  IMRA
 
Israpundit
  Israel Defense
  Israel Insider
  Israel NN
  JNewsWire
  Pro-Life
 
Covenant News

 
Life News
  Life Site
  Pro-Life America
  Pro-Life Blogs

  Military
  Military City
  Air Force
  ARMY
  Coast Guard
  MARINES
  National Guard
  NAVY

  Media Watch
 
AIM
 
Honest Reporting
  Media Research
 
MEMRI
  MEMRI TV
  News Busters



 
 
 

 


 
 Guest Commentary


Liberal Lawyers Seek to Curry Favor from Missouri Courts?
By Andrew W. Pollock III
MichNews.com

Mar 14, 2007


Over the years I've read about U.S. supreme court justices calling upon lawyers to step forward and protect judges in the forum of public opinion when these judges are criticized for making rulings that embody legislative-like components, thereby infringing on the powers of the legislative branch of government. Some courts have even gone so far as to make rulings that embody appropriations mandates. In the summer of 2005, the Kansas Supreme Court, in the Montoy Case, mandated that the Kansas legislature increase appropriations for public education. The Kansas Supreme Court was not above using extortion to compel the legislature to acquiesce, and threatened that unless the demanded appropriation was made, that they would use their writ-issuing authority to shut down the public schools in the state of Kansas. The naked tyranny exercised by the court in this case was an affront to every person in America who embraces the principle of "government of the people, by the people, and for the people" including the fine people of the state of Missouri. Accordingly, the Missouri legislature has decided to consider: "House Joint Resolution 1 [which] would strip Missouri courts of jurisdiction to hear cases involving public education, property taxes, eminent domain and other matters."

The primary opponents to this joint resolution appear to be certain lawyers, some of whom may actually bring cases before the judges whose powers they seem to be trying to protect. The problem with this circumstance is the appearance of impropriety. Would Missouri judges favor, consciously or subconsciously, the cases of attorneys who were in the forefront of protecting judges from the legislative and oversight authority of the Missouri legislature? Even if this were not the case, it creates the appearance that judges would become beholden to the lawyers who are opposed to the joint resolution.

The public should call upon the Missouri judiciary to disavow and denounce any action by any lawyer or bar association in the state of Missouri which acts to promote political objectives that give the appearance of seeking to curry favor with the judiciary thereby undermining public confidence in a fair and impartial Missouri judiciary.

Copyright by Andrew W. Pollock III

 


Copyright© MichNews.com. All Rights Reserved.

Top of Page    Email this article    Printer friendly article

Digg This Article          Instant Message this article

To submit feedback, news articles, commentary, news tips and suggestions, please Click Here.

 

.
Guest Commentary
Giving Marriage Back to the Church
 
Michigan's Future - Beyond Bleak
 
Sex Goes Public
 
Mitt Romney's tough love for Detroit
 
Are We Mad Or Just Blind To History?
 
Liberals misunderstand the pro-life position
 
A Penny for Their Souls
 
Barack and the Bishops
 
GOP Needs More Sarahs and Fewer Arnolds
 
I feel your pain, Rosie, Ellen and Melissa
 
The End Game
 
Administrator of the Catholic Diocese of Charleston stepped in it... Part One
 
Administrator of the Catholic Diocese of Charleston stepped in it... Part Two
 
The Cost of Democracy
 
Obama: Fear and the Security Force
 
Palestine, President Peres and Poppycock
 
America's Future Depends On A Holy People
 
Will we continue to be able to say "being born an American is to win first prize in the lottery of life?"
 
Counterfeit Marriage and its Counterfeit Movement
 
A Letter to My Wrestlers
 
Slumping Carbon "Cap-and-Trade" Price Worries Greens
 
Welcome To Obamaburger. May I Take Your Money?
 
The Censorship Doctrine
 
The Threat Within
 
Understanding the Concept of Reform
 

.

  Website Note: Views expressed by individual authors and/or sources do not necessarily reflect those of MichNews.com..

 

MichNews.com: Dedicated In Honor of God and In Memory of Linda.

Contact Us 

Copyright ©2000-2008. MichNews.com All Rights Reserved.

www.sesiweb.us