.
.
.
 MichNews.com
  FRONT PAGE
  Website Note
  Newswire
  Matt C. Abbott
  Chris G. Adamo
  Mike M. Bates
  Felicia Benamon
  Alan Caruba
  Tom DeWeese
  A.J. DiCintio
  Lee Ellis
  Gabriel Garnica
  Michael J. Gaynor
  Diane M. Grassi
  Gerald A. Honigman
  Jim Kouri
  Rachel Neuwirth
  Doug Schmitz
  Barbara J. Stock
  J. Grant Swank, Jr.
  JB Williams
  Sher Zieve
  Guest Commentary
  Cartoons / Humor
  Favorite Links
.
  News Links

  AP Breaking News
  Drudge Report
  FOX News
  FOX Sports
  News Max
  UPI NewsTrack
  Washington Times
  White House
  Internet News
 
America's T.F.
  Bloomberg
  Catholic News
  Christian Headlines
  Christian Post
  Christian Today
  CNET Technology

  Court TV
  Immigration News

  Investors Bus.
  Jihad Watch
  Keep&Bear Arms
  Lucianne
  News.Ask.com
  News Portal
  World Tribune
  Conservative
  American Spectator
  CNSNews.com
  FrontPage Mag
  Heritage.org
  Human Events
  Michael Savage
  Peter Glover
  Rush Limbaugh
  Sean Hannity
  Townhall
  Weekly Standard
  War on Terror
 
Americans Against Hate

  Black Anthem
  CENTCOM
  Defense Link
  DHS | FBI
  Ready.gov
  Israel
  Debka
  IMRA
 
Israpundit
  Israel Defense
  Israel Insider
  Israel NN
  JNewsWire
  Pro-Life
 
Covenant News

 
Life News
  Life Site
  Pro-Life America
  Pro-Life Blogs

  Military
  Military City
  Air Force
  ARMY
  Coast Guard
  MARINES
  National Guard
  NAVY

  Media Watch
 
AIM
 
Honest Reporting
  Media Research
 
MEMRI
  MEMRI TV
  News Busters



 
 
 

 


 
 Guest Commentary


Liberal Lawyers Seek to Curry Favor from Missouri Courts?
By Andrew W. Pollock III
MichNews.com

Mar 14, 2007


Over the years I've read about U.S. supreme court justices calling upon lawyers to step forward and protect judges in the forum of public opinion when these judges are criticized for making rulings that embody legislative-like components, thereby infringing on the powers of the legislative branch of government. Some courts have even gone so far as to make rulings that embody appropriations mandates. In the summer of 2005, the Kansas Supreme Court, in the Montoy Case, mandated that the Kansas legislature increase appropriations for public education. The Kansas Supreme Court was not above using extortion to compel the legislature to acquiesce, and threatened that unless the demanded appropriation was made, that they would use their writ-issuing authority to shut down the public schools in the state of Kansas. The naked tyranny exercised by the court in this case was an affront to every person in America who embraces the principle of "government of the people, by the people, and for the people" including the fine people of the state of Missouri. Accordingly, the Missouri legislature has decided to consider: "House Joint Resolution 1 [which] would strip Missouri courts of jurisdiction to hear cases involving public education, property taxes, eminent domain and other matters."

The primary opponents to this joint resolution appear to be certain lawyers, some of whom may actually bring cases before the judges whose powers they seem to be trying to protect. The problem with this circumstance is the appearance of impropriety. Would Missouri judges favor, consciously or subconsciously, the cases of attorneys who were in the forefront of protecting judges from the legislative and oversight authority of the Missouri legislature? Even if this were not the case, it creates the appearance that judges would become beholden to the lawyers who are opposed to the joint resolution.

The public should call upon the Missouri judiciary to disavow and denounce any action by any lawyer or bar association in the state of Missouri which acts to promote political objectives that give the appearance of seeking to curry favor with the judiciary thereby undermining public confidence in a fair and impartial Missouri judiciary.

Copyright by Andrew W. Pollock III

 


Copyright© MichNews.com. All Rights Reserved.

Top of Page    Email this article    Printer friendly article

Digg This Article          Instant Message this article

To submit feedback, news articles, commentary, news tips and suggestions, please Click Here.

 

.
Guest Commentary
Failed Politics
 
The Immoral Jews of 2008
 
Dems' 'Interfaith Service' to Include Atheists?
 
Train Yourself To Discern Good From Evil
 
Change? Looks Like More of the Same
 
Beware the Catholic Hucksters
 
Judge-mentally Impaired Should Get Off Michael Savage's Back
 
Is anyone listening to what Obama says?
 
The Rules for Democrats and Republicans
 
Signs of Intelligent Life Discovered in Washington
 
Obama's Magical Mystery Tour
 
Obama, the World Teacher
 
Sarkozy Succumbs To Mediterranean Mismatch
 
"Consensus" on Man-Made Warming Shattering
 
Change We Really Need
 
Is it time to mourn for Israel?
 
Are Liberals Finally Coming Around On Homosexuality?
 
John McCain Is For Me
 
The Gift
 
Democrats playing (bad) politics with oil
 
The AP Steps In Its Own Excrement
 
Are Internet news sites a better source of information than newspapers?
 
The Pope, Palestine and Papal Politics
 
Jesse Jackson Has No Clothes
 
Academic Freedom
 

.

  Website Note: Views expressed by individual authors and/or sources do not necessarily reflect those of MichNews.com..

 

MichNews.com: Dedicated In Honor of God and In Memory of Linda.

Contact Us 

Copyright ©2000-2008. MichNews.com All Rights Reserved.

www.sesiweb.us