.
.
.
 MichNews.com
  FRONT PAGE
  Website Note
  Newswire
  Matt C. Abbott
  Chris G. Adamo
  Mike M. Bates
  Felicia Benamon
  Alan Caruba
  Tom DeWeese
  A.J. DiCintio
  Lee Ellis
  Gabriel Garnica
  Michael J. Gaynor
  Diane M. Grassi
  Gerald A. Honigman
  Jim Kouri
  Rachel Neuwirth
  Doug Schmitz
  Barbara J. Stock
  J. Grant Swank, Jr.
  JB Williams
  Sher Zieve
  Guest Commentary
  Cartoons / Humor
  Favorite Links
.
  News Links

  AP Breaking News
  Drudge Report
  FOX News
  FOX Sports
  News Max
  UPI NewsTrack
  Washington Times
  White House
  Internet News
 
America's T.F.
  Bloomberg
  Catholic News
  Christian Headlines
  Christian Post
  Christian Today
  CNET Technology

  Court TV
  Immigration News

  Investors Bus.
  Jihad Watch
  Keep&Bear Arms
  Lucianne
  News.Ask.com
  News Portal
  World Tribune
  Conservative
  American Spectator
  CNSNews.com
  FrontPage Mag
  Heritage.org
  Human Events
  Michael Savage
  Peter Glover
  Rush Limbaugh
  Sean Hannity
  Townhall
  Weekly Standard
  War on Terror
 
Americans Against Hate

  Black Anthem
  CENTCOM
  Defense Link
  DHS | FBI
  Ready.gov
  Israel
  Debka
  IMRA
 
Israpundit
  Israel Defense
  Israel Insider
  Israel NN
  JNewsWire
  Pro-Life
 
Covenant News

 
Life News
  Life Site
  Pro-Life America
  Pro-Life Blogs

  Military
  Military City
  Air Force
  ARMY
  Coast Guard
  MARINES
  National Guard
  NAVY

  Media Watch
 
AIM
 
Honest Reporting
  Media Research
 
MEMRI
  MEMRI TV
  News Busters



 
 
 

 


 
 A.J. DiCintio


After Oregon Things Fall Apart
By A.J. DiCintio
MichNews.com

Mar 24, 2008


We can be pretty sure the Democratic Party’s superdelegates don’t curl up in a chair every evening musing over Yeats’ “The Second Coming.” However, we can be absolutely certain those pompous reactionaries agonize day and night over a Democratic Party wildly “turning and turning in the widening gyre” of anger, foul play, and bitterness.

 

In fact, though the supers wear a smile in public, most of the card-carrying aristocrats must be pulling out their hair, so distraught are they that the Party’s ugly in-fighting will get so bad as to make “things fall apart,” indeed, fall apart so much that “the centre cannot hold,” unleashing that Democratic horror of horrors: the “mere anarchy” of 1968.

 

We can also say of a repugnant bunch who accept the label “supercitizen” that like all who can’t stand democracy when it stands in their way, “The best lack all conviction, while the worst are full of passionate intensity.”

 

Of course, those words from Yeats’ poem simply give us another way of saying the supers are politicians, a fact explaining why the threat of things falling apart after Oregon will stiffen their spines just enough to allow them to coalesce around Barack Obama.

 

(Because they are politicians, they will then mutter disingenuous regrets to Hillary and Bill, incapable of mustering the courage to do what is right for the nation and their party by telling the sleazy duo to slouch towards Chappaqua, taking their monarchial dream with them.)

 

But why all this unity after the Oregon Primary?

 

To answer that question we must return to the past, say, 1960, when, out of sight of televison’s eye, party bosses (the superdelegates of those days) hid their dirty deal making behind closed doors. 

 

Later, amid an atmosphere of tense anticipation whipped up by cheerleading floor reporters, state party chairs spoke not a word about back rooms and bosses as they proudly intoned, “The great state of . . ., canteloupe capital of the worrrrld, casts 80 votes for the next prrrresident of the United States . . .”

 

During their few seconds in the bright lights, those party stalwarts never demeaned smaller states or complained about what might, could, or should have been; for they understood that the game was now all about revealing which candidate would garner the majority of “democratically” elected delegates and which state would enjoy the privilege of putting that candidate over the top.

 

When we apply the lessons learned from smoke-filled rooms where party bosses told citizens what was good for them and convention floors where party lieutenants pretended everything was on the up and up to the current Democratic primary, we get the  answers to the “Why after Oregon” question. 

 

…Because in 2008 Oregon will announce that Barack Obama has won a majority of the Democratic Party’s elected delegates, the Jeffersonian answer to delegates bought in rooms in which a cigar is never just a cigar, its size and cost denoting the size of one’s power and the cost of one’s influence.

 

…Because the modern media will instantaneously flash news of Obama’s victory to the nation and the world.

 

…Because it is nearly impossible Michigan and Florida will reverse the reality established by Oregon. (To garner just one more elected delegate than Obama, Mrs. Clinton must swamp him in virtually every primary from Pennsylvania to Puerto Rico and score 60% wins in both Michigan and Florida.)

 

…Because upon hearing the news, Obama voters, including 90% of black voters and millions of white Liberals and Obamayouth, will focus on “superdelegate” as the abominable euphemism it is.

 

…Because as they ponder that euphemism and contemplate a rejection of their man by the supers, the Obama majority will threaten to create an ever widening gyre” of turmoil sure to culminate in an ugly vortex of anger, epithets, and fists in Denver, a fact that has frightening implications not just for Democrats in November but for the Democratic Party’s future.

 

…because the more the public focuses on the supers, the more it will perceive them as a metaphor for the Democratic Party’s fundamental illness, an illness that impels a body to mindlessly huff and puff on that arrogant, wasteful, democracy destroying twist of decrepit tobacco popular today only among pompous ass Leftist “intellectuals,” jackass Leftist dictators, and fat ass members of the world’s celebrity culture.

 

It is true, of course, that despite all the “becauses” mentioned, the supers will decide to do something else after Oregon. Fortunately for America, their behavior doesn’t matter in the long run; for whether they choose Obama or offer the nation a second coming of the Clinton scourge, there will be an election season this fall in which voters will make up their minds about John McCain and the Democratic nominee after carefully considering a number of crucially important issues — especially the ones implicit in the final “because” listed above.

 

Copyright by A.J. DiCintio


Copyright© MichNews.com. All Rights Reserved.

Top of Page    Email this article    Printer friendly article

Digg This Article          Instant Message this article

To submit feedback, news articles, commentary, news tips and suggestions, please Click Here.

 

.
A.J. DiCintio
Brooks' Conservative Revival Revisited
 
Vetoing Hillary
 
Goodbye Hillary, Goodbye Barack
 
Alice in a Mad, Mad Wonderland
 
Hillary's Paradise Lost
 
The Second Amendment, the Court, and the Election
 
After Oregon Things Fall Apart
 
Hillary: Hoist with Her Own Petard
 
That Devil Called Denial
 
Hillary's NAFTA Running Naked Through Ohio
 
Can We Hear Dick Morris Now?
 
Progressives Strut Their Stuff
 
Bill and Hillary Billions
 
Democratic Ostriches
 
John Edwards' Greatest Service
 
The Clintons and the Race Issue
 
An Ironic Thing Happened on the Way to the Coronation
 
Iowa's Shot Heard Round the Nation
 
To Black Americans -- And Every Other Citizen
 
Stinking Perfectly
 
Unpardonable
 
EEOC Commissars in the Big Picture
 
Hillary Clinton's Candidacy: Two Elephants in the Room
 
Election '07: Voters Prove Their Sanity
 
Cave Man Governor Finds His Woman
 

.

  Website Note: Views expressed by individual authors and/or sources do not necessarily reflect those of MichNews.com..

 

MichNews.com: Dedicated In Honor of God and In Memory of Linda.

Contact Us 

Copyright ©2000-2008. MichNews.com All Rights Reserved.

www.sesiweb.us